War and Peace in the Nuclear Age; Interview with Petra Kelly, 1986
- Transcript
Mae rwyb nad Llywun, cymdi B at f��dbf wnen mwydl iawn mynd i sylwedd coor Architectur o'r mu ft odd i Cavellur yw Sreithffyr tua mewn dill. Ok, gydw y myd i. Myndain, gydw yw'r lawmakers mezain, yd Shadow using primary bat, hatat yn gyfer mewn dualall? Elwn. Ys yn lion yn da da bod bryd跳nau, Sant Gwyllfiall yw Gunder llenud yn un.nyna 5 ddellunio'r due jorn yn ymlamos le anonsuus, ddechap arlo. Nadego— yda unheransaid суaiddag diagram Jahr fan fel ymd Meinlimi ddaod lan a eu gorig a callig llodaràus yn gwlo i'n gwyrau. Ym chi donornau ychyd, ac rwyydd yn gweithal biwn newydd. Gw ensuring a dddelly un gyda iawnion. Yar mae'n arwer par defnichos managedaaaid. But if I go on if I think you're getting too long
but when you say when you begin it's difficult then try going to content and why try then going to the content of why it had begun. Yes. Yes. We're slightly more discursive. If you like to tell us why. Good. So I just go on. One of the reasons was of course that the European peace movement felt that the deployment of these missiles on European soil, on German soil would be a very great danger towards the Soviet Union and that those missiles could reach the Soviet Union make it vulnerable within five to six minutes. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger. It would be a great danger.
It would be a great danger.
- Raw Footage
- Interview with Petra Kelly, 1986
- Contributing Organization
- WGBH (Boston, Massachusetts)
- AAPB ID
- cpb-aacip/15-rf5k931f24
If you have more information about this item than what is given here, or if you have concerns about this record, we want to know! Contact us, indicating the AAPB ID (cpb-aacip/15-rf5k931f24).
- Description
- Episode Description
- Petra Kelly was one of the founders of the German Green Party. In the interview she discusses her views of the European peace movement and the development of arms control. Her opening comments focus on the debates over Pershing II and cruise missile deployments in the late 1970s, opposition to which, she says, triggered the peace movement in Germany. She defends the movement from various criticisms, explains its diverse reach across Europe, and credits it with important successes. In her opinion, the increased possibility of a limited nuclear strike in Europe was the most important explanation for the rise of the movement, and she adds that this concern continues to grow as nuclear weapons become smaller and more precise. On the question of credit for recent arms control progress, her view is that Reagan and Gorbachev would not have succeeded without the positive climate brought about by the peace movement. She expresses views on a variety of other issues including the ineffectiveness of deterrence the current state of arms control, and the pressures Chancellor Kohl is facing from the peace movement and the U.S. government.
- Date
- 1986-12-16
- Date
- 1986-12-16
- Asset type
- Raw Footage
- Subjects
- North Atlantic Treaty Organization; SS-20 Missile; Afghanistan; Great Britain; France; Soviet Union; United States; Germany; Cruise missiles; Strategic Defense Initiative; Pershing (Missile); Summit meetings--Iceland--Reykjavik; nuclear weapons; Nuclear arms control; Peace movements; Antinuclear movement; Todenhofer, Jurgen, 1940-; Kohl, Helmut, 1930-; Weinberger, Caspar W.; Schmidt, Helmut, 1918 Dec. 23-; Gorbachev, Mikhail; Reagan, Ronald; Shultz, George Pratt, 1920-
- Rights
- Rights Note:,Rights:,Rights Credit:WGBH Educational Foundation,Rights Type:All,Rights Coverage:,Rights Holder:WGBH Educational Foundation
- Media type
- Moving Image
- Duration
- 00:19:58
- Credits
-
-
Interviewee2: Kelly, Petra Karin, 1947-1992
Publisher: WGBH Educational Foundation
- AAPB Contributor Holdings
-
WGBH
Identifier: 3a8671092a9609ab690f3abec4b102d1b0200914 (ArtesiaDAM UOI_ID)
Format: Quicktime
Color: Color
Duration: 00:00:00
If you have a copy of this asset and would like us to add it to our catalog, please contact us.
- Citations
- Chicago: “War and Peace in the Nuclear Age; Interview with Petra Kelly, 1986,” 1986-12-16, WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC, accessed April 16, 2024, http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-rf5k931f24.
- MLA: “War and Peace in the Nuclear Age; Interview with Petra Kelly, 1986.” 1986-12-16. WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Web. April 16, 2024. <http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-rf5k931f24>.
- APA: War and Peace in the Nuclear Age; Interview with Petra Kelly, 1986. Boston, MA: WGBH, American Archive of Public Broadcasting (GBH and the Library of Congress), Boston, MA and Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-rf5k931f24